dog dr wrote:ezzy333 wrote:Sharon wrote:Interesting post. I was wondering what was meant by a "good vet". My vet trials her retrievers so understands hunting dogs. That is important to me.
I have wondered about this too. I really think what people mean is they found one they like and that has little to do with how good they might be.
I agree. What always throws me off is when they say they found a vet that knows hunting dogs. My opinion is that as far as physiology and anatomy are concerned, a dog is a dog is a dog. There are very few things, if any, that a hunting dog will come into contact with or be exposed to that a non-hunting dog will not, if you really stop and think about it. I think what they mean is they found a vet that understands hunters. I have often wondered if, as a veterinarian, am I there to serve, respond to, and treat the animal or the owner?? I would argue that it is at least as much the owner as it is the dog, sometimes more. BUT, I also agree that finding a vet your comfortable with is definitely very important. Glad you found one you like!
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
LOL Well said. Every Dr. has to have a good bedside manner. Just had knee surgery; I asked the surgeon when my knee would feel normal again.
She said, " Depends how big a whiner you are." :roll:
I like a vet who has hunting dogs because they understand about letting the dog off leash in the bush/woods and the risks that involves. Had a vet once who who rolled his eyes when I said I hunted the dog .
One really has no idea if their vet or Dr is any good. For all I know mine failed the "signs of mange/anatomy of the hips" part.

All we can really go by is ,"Do I like the guy/gal?" as Ezzy said.