Wing works vs q5 centerfire
-
- Rank: Just A Pup
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Sat May 16, 2015 10:32 am
- Location: Sonoma County,CA
Wing works vs q5 centerfire
Need a chukar vest. I rock my filson strap for pheasant but I need to carry more water when we go for chukar. Live in CA. One dog and me.
I always hear that wingworks is very good but the q5 also seems nice. Just want to see if anyone has used both. Thanks!
I always hear that wingworks is very good but the q5 also seems nice. Just want to see if anyone has used both. Thanks!
- Dakotazeb
- Rank: 4X Champion
- Posts: 671
- Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2014 1:10 pm
- Location: South Dakota / Arizona
Re: Wing works vs q5 centerfire
I don't have any experience with the q5 but I have had a WingWorks for several years and don't think you could find a better vest. They are built like a tank and should last a lifetime. Plenty of room for everything you need on your hunt and the game bag is very easy to reach and load. Loading the bird into some strap vests can be difficult but not with the WW. Good luck with your choice.
-
- Rank: Just A Pup
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Sat May 16, 2015 10:32 am
- Location: Sonoma County,CA
Re: Wing works vs q5 centerfire
Does the wing works have extra room to put a jacket or snacks or a first aid kit?
- Dakotazeb
- Rank: 4X Champion
- Posts: 671
- Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2014 1:10 pm
- Location: South Dakota / Arizona
Re: Wing works vs q5 centerfire
Yes. There is a pouch on the back and also a strap to lash a jacket to. WingWorks has a bunch of difference accessories you can add to the vest. Go to their website and take a look. http://wingworks.biz/rocksteady1 wrote:Does the wing works have extra room to put a jacket or snacks or a first aid kit?
If possible you should really look at each of these vests before purchasing.
-
- Rank: 3X Champion
- Posts: 520
- Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 6:44 pm
- Location: Bend, OR
Re: Wing works vs q5 centerfire
Wingworks, hands down. Q5 has engineering issues that impair functionality.
Wing works vs q5 centerfire
Even with the new updated version?Scott Linden wrote:Wingworks, hands down. Q5 has engineering issues that impair functionality.
Wing works vs q5 centerfire
+1 for wing works!!!
Re: Wing works vs q5 centerfire
Wing Works because it rides on your hips like a backpack.
I sometimes carry 6 quarts of water, a box of shells, lunch, Alpha 100, plus other stuff in mine when chukar hunting.... A good 35 pounds!!! If this load was on my shoulders I would never make it.
I sometimes carry 6 quarts of water, a box of shells, lunch, Alpha 100, plus other stuff in mine when chukar hunting.... A good 35 pounds!!! If this load was on my shoulders I would never make it.
- UglyD
- Rank: Senior Hunter
- Posts: 158
- Joined: Thu May 17, 2012 2:29 pm
- Location: Paradise------------- Utah
Re: Wing works vs q5 centerfire
I went thru a back operation- so carrying items incorrectly take their toll. A good back though is a pleasure to have on and hike with. The WW is the one hunting vest I found that meets that bill. If it wasn't for that vest I am sure I wouldn't hunt chukars- I couldn't carry the water needed for the dogs otherwise.
- P&PGunsmith
- Rank: Master Hunter
- Posts: 214
- Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2011 8:28 am
- Location: Northern California
Re: Wing works vs q5 centerfire
If you are not stuck on either. Try the Bucks Bag, it was designed and built in Idaho for chukar hunters.
http://www.bucksbags.com/cm_cat.asp?id=27
http://www.bucksbags.com/cm_cat.asp?id=27
Re: Wing works vs q5 centerfire
I've not tried the Q5 but I have owned a WW vest for 5 years now.
I've had Filsons (and still use one for training), Cabelas and Quilomene I'll never own any other vest because I doubt I will wear the WW vest out. Its that well made.
They are a little spendy but not much more than the Filson last time I checked.
Holds plenty of water and shells. Rides on the hips, has a pocket on the backside with a tie down strap for your jacket when things warm up plus a couple extra pockets for the small stuff
I really don't think you will be disappointed in the WW vest
I've had Filsons (and still use one for training), Cabelas and Quilomene I'll never own any other vest because I doubt I will wear the WW vest out. Its that well made.
They are a little spendy but not much more than the Filson last time I checked.
Holds plenty of water and shells. Rides on the hips, has a pocket on the backside with a tie down strap for your jacket when things warm up plus a couple extra pockets for the small stuff
I really don't think you will be disappointed in the WW vest