Does anyone use black and gold dog food
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2014 6:30 pm
Does anyone use Black And Gold food and what are your thoughts?
Hunting Dog Training, Gun Dog Puppies, and Discussion
http://gundogforum.com/forum/
This site is put out by a dentist and is just his idea of what he likes with no basis in fact that I can find.tieflyer wrote:Not sure if you ever use this site but I thought you might want to view it.http://www.dogfoodadvisor.com/dog-food- ... -dog-food/
I wouldn't waste my time on that site.ezzy333 wrote:This site is put out by a dentist and is just his idea of what he likes with no basis in fact that I can find.tieflyer wrote:Not sure if you ever use this site but I thought you might want to view it.http://www.dogfoodadvisor.com/dog-food- ... -dog-food/
ezzy333 wrote: This site is put out by a dentist and is just his idea of what he likes with no basis in fact that I can find.
Another good reason to feed raw. I don't have to worry about weather or not stuff like this is true or not. When you feed raw, what you feed is what you get, no hidden ingredients...birddogger wrote:I wouldn't waste my time on that site.Charlie
Well, then can you and Ezzy tell me if the information presented above is true or not? If its true I wouldn't want to use this kibble. Or maybe we should call on Monsterdad to verify these ingredients.. He said some kibble makers don't even have to list some of the potentially harmful ingredients used because of the fact that they are put there by other manufactures of ingredients used in the kibble being made. If I feed raw chicken, all that's in it is raw chicken, now does it make sense?birddogger wrote:BH, because there are biased web sites, it is a reason to feed raw? Hidden ingredients? I don't think so. You make no sense. By now we all know you feed raw and nobody cares but you just won't leave it alone. :roll: :roll:
Charlie
Did you raise the chickens yourself? There may be potentially harmful, hidden ingredients in them - put there by the other manufacturer.Bounty_Hunter wrote:Well, then can you and Ezzy tell me if the information presented above is true or not? If its true I wouldn't want to use this kibble. Or maybe we should call on Monsterdad to verify these ingredients.. He said some kibble makers don't even have to list some of the potentially harmful ingredients used because of the fact that they are put there by other manufactures of ingredients used in the kibble being made. If I feed raw chicken, all that's in it is raw chicken, now does it make sense?birddogger wrote:BH, because there are biased web sites, it is a reason to feed raw? Hidden ingredients? I don't think so. You make no sense. By now we all know you feed raw and nobody cares but you just won't leave it alone. :roll: :roll:
Charlie
Thanks for the concern. I don't raise my own chickens but I do get fresh eggs from a farmer we know because of how he cares for his chickens. I also plant a lot of vegetables we use. We do buy antibiotic free chicken for the family but not the dog. He gets regular store bought chicken when there are mark down sales. He also gets wild game and some road kill too.slistoe wrote:Did you raise the chickens yourself? There may be potentially harmful, hidden ingredients in them - put there by the other manufacturer.I really hope you are putting as much thought and effort into what you feed yourself and your family.
I think the list of ingredients of each brand is accurate and can be verified by reading the bag of a particular product that catches your interest. In this way the site may be useful. I did not mean to stir up the bee's nest. Dog food brands seem to be a volatile subject on this site. " I come in peace".ezzy333 wrote:This site is put out by a dentist and is just his idea of what he likes with no basis in fact that I can find.tieflyer wrote:Not sure if you ever use this site but I thought you might want to view it.http://www.dogfoodadvisor.com/dog-food- ... -dog-food/
Tieflyer, I wasn't taking a shot at you but just reporting what has been discovered from research that has been done several moons ago. You are right he does show you what the bags of feed have on them but that tells you little about the formulation or the quality of a feed. Most of the feeds that are on the market that have been there for several years are pretty good feeds since they don't last long if there customers are not happy with their products and continue to buy them. A very high percentage of what you read and hear iss put out by the marketing division of the companies and not the nutrition department.tieflyer wrote:I think the list of ingredients of each brand is accurate and can be verified by reading the bag of a particular product that catches your interest. In this way the site may be useful. I did not mean to stir up the bee's nest. Dog food brands seem to be a volatile subject on this site. " I come in peace".ezzy333 wrote:This site is put out by a dentist and is just his idea of what he likes with no basis in fact that I can find.tieflyer wrote:Not sure if you ever use this site but I thought you might want to view it.http://www.dogfoodadvisor.com/dog-food- ... -dog-food/
You ever checked the incidence of salmonella in raw chicken....you probably wouldn't be nearly as proud of what you're feeding if you had.Bounty_Hunter wrote:Well, then can you and Ezzy tell me if the information presented above is true or not? If its true I wouldn't want to use this kibble. Or maybe we should call on Monsterdad to verify these ingredients.. He said some kibble makers don't even have to list some of the potentially harmful ingredients used because of the fact that they are put there by other manufactures of ingredients used in the kibble being made. If I feed raw chicken, all that's in it is raw chicken, now does it make sense?birddogger wrote:BH, because there are biased web sites, it is a reason to feed raw? Hidden ingredients? I don't think so. You make no sense. By now we all know you feed raw and nobody cares but you just won't leave it alone. :roll: :roll:
Charlie