BDC question??
- Jagerdawg
- Rank: Master Hunter
- Posts: 277
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2012 6:05 am
- Location: Southern Michigan
Re: BDC question??
The BDC was developed for the average hunter with the average hunting dog to be able to compete in a fun format. It wasn't developed to test the breeding potential of dogs. It is what it is a fun way for a person with a dog that isn't trained so well to compete. I haven't read anyone say these are poor or inferior dogs just that they aren't well trained or broke. The only thing said is that the BDC it's not a good way of judging breeding potential. What is wrong with that it wasn't designed to. Enjoy and have fun in whatever venue you choose.
-
- Rank: 5X Champion
- Posts: 1167
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 12:18 pm
Re: BDC question??
Again. You continue to be defensive and take my words of context. I did not say they cannot be good dogs. I said the format does not do enough to differentiate between quality dogs and average/less quality dogs and therefore is lacking as a proving ground. Keep saying I'm saying things I'm actually not though.smoothbean wrote:The funny part of those saying that these tournament dogs do not measure up to their standards is that some of these dogs come from the very lines that you are so high on. So in a sense you are bashing your own people. LOL! I personally know guys that are running NSTRA bred dogs as well as a few horseback dogs.
I also agree with EZZY that people are confusing a good dog with a well trained dog. You can train a lot of things but some the dogs just has to have.
Again the key is training for the game being played.
Much can also be said for handlers as well, a great handler can make a mediocre dog look good as well as a poor handler can not let a great dogs talent show.
-
- Rank: 5X Champion
- Posts: 1167
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 12:18 pm
Re: BDC question??
There's more that goes into defining a quality dog than just find, shoot, retrieve, and not considering tge quality of the dog's work itself. Bird finding ability is important and should be a big part of deciding what is a quality dog for continuing bird dog lines. But there's much more that goes into it than that and that can't be the only thing a format should be based on if it wants to be considered a legitimate proving ground.nikegundog wrote:I would say that the dog that finds the most birds, allows the hunter a shot within shooting range and completes the retrieve tells me more about the dogs worth than having a judge look at a dogs tail and give it a rating and use what he perceives as style to place the dog. To each his own, I'll take the tangible over the intangible.romeo212000 wrote:While I see how such a game could be fun ad entertaining to the average hunter, I fail to see how a game that does not judge quality of work is beneficial for the furthering of hunting dog lines. Is it fun? I'm sure it is. But there is no way I would consider making a dog part of my breeding program based on their accomplishments in such a format that does not truly seek to improve hunting dog lines.
"I'll take the tangible over the intangible"
Spoken like someone who has no understanding of how nstra and other formats operate.
Last edited by romeo212000 on Thu Nov 22, 2012 7:59 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Rank: 5X Champion
- Posts: 1167
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 12:18 pm
Re: BDC question??
Exactly my point, and pretty much exactly what I've been saying. People get so defensive though that they fail to actually read and comprehend what is actually being said. Kind of like smoothbean insisting I'm saying the dogs that compete in these formats are no good or "bashing" them. I never once said that. Please go back and quote where I did. You won't be able to though. He's just so wrapped up in being defensive he's missing the whole point of what I'm trying to say.Jagerdawg wrote:The BDC was developed for the average hunter with the average hunting dog to be able to compete in a fun format. It wasn't developed to test the breeding potential of dogs. It is what it is a fun way for a person with a dog that isn't trained so well to compete. I haven't read anyone say these are poor or inferior dogs just that they aren't well trained or broke. The only thing said is that the BDC it's not a good way of judging breeding potential. What is wrong with that it wasn't designed to. Enjoy and have fun in whatever venue you choose.
- nikegundog
- GDF Junkie
- Posts: 1508
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 11:21 am
- Location: SW Minnesota
Re: BDC question??
Man, 16 posts in a page and a half and you think someone else is getting defensive.romeo212000 wrote: Exactly my point, and pretty much exactly what I've been saying. People get so defensive though that they fail to actually read and comprehend what is actually being said. Kind of like smoothbean insisting I'm saying the dogs that compete in these formats are no good or "bashing" them. I never once said that. Please go back and quote where I did. You won't be able to though. He's just so wrapped up in being defensive he's missing the whole point of what I'm trying to say.
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
-
- Rank: 5X Champion
- Posts: 1167
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 12:18 pm
Re: BDC question??
All I'm doing is responding to others who have made comments showing a lack of comprehension about what I've said, including you. If you're going to comment on a subject you should at least be somewhat knowledgable on it.nikegundog wrote:Man, 16 posts in a page and a half and you think someone else is getting defensive.romeo212000 wrote: Exactly my point, and pretty much exactly what I've been saying. People get so defensive though that they fail to actually read and comprehend what is actually being said. Kind of like smoothbean insisting I'm saying the dogs that compete in these formats are no good or "bashing" them. I never once said that. Please go back and quote where I did. You won't be able to though. He's just so wrapped up in being defensive he's missing the whole point of what I'm trying to say.No need to get your panties in a wad over a discussion, to each his own.
Go back and read the thread. The defensive ones who jump to conclusions that aren't there are easy to spot. Hint: it's not me.
- nikegundog
- GDF Junkie
- Posts: 1508
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 11:21 am
- Location: SW Minnesota
Re: BDC question??
If we you are going to discuss knowledgeable the least you could do is spell it right, as far as lack of comprehension.........Pot to the Kettle........regards.romeo212000 wrote: All I'm doing is responding to others who have made comments showing a lack of comprehension about what I've said, including you. If you're going to comment on a subject you should at least be somewhat knowledgable on it.
Go back and read the thread. The defensive ones who jump to conclusions that aren't there are easy to spot. Hint: it's not me.
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
-
- Rank: 5X Champion
- Posts: 1167
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 12:18 pm
Re: BDC question??
I'm typing on my phone, but very classy move there mr grammar police. Enjoy your holiday. It's obvious you're in over your head with regards to the subject matter.nikegundog wrote:If we you are going to discuss knowledgeable the least you could do is spell it right, as far as lack of comprehension.........Pot to the Kettle........regards.romeo212000 wrote: All I'm doing is responding to others who have made comments showing a lack of comprehension about what I've said, including you. If you're going to comment on a subject you should at least be somewhat knowledgable on it.
Go back and read the thread. The defensive ones who jump to conclusions that aren't there are easy to spot. Hint: it's not me.
Re: BDC question??
anything here about quality of the dogs?romeo212000 wrote:Pretty much the same thing I've seen. I wouldn't want anything to do with one of those dogs.
http://www.perfectpedigrees.com/4genview.php?id=144
http://www.perfectpedigrees.com/4genview.php?id=207
It's not how many breaths you have taken but how many times it has been taken away!
Has anyone noticed common sense isn't very common anymore.
http://www.perfectpedigrees.com/4genview.php?id=207
It's not how many breaths you have taken but how many times it has been taken away!
Has anyone noticed common sense isn't very common anymore.
Re: BDC question??
Nothing here about quality eithr I suppose.romeo212000 wrote:In nstra the dogs that run to the back of the field every time before they start looking for birds are not going to be the best ones. I want the dog that's looking for birds the second I turn them loose, but still covering ground. Personally, I have no interest in a dog that works in gun range the whole time and never touches the boundary of a 15 acre field. Does ufta judge the quality of dog work at all or is it just a timed event.
http://www.perfectpedigrees.com/4genview.php?id=144
http://www.perfectpedigrees.com/4genview.php?id=207
It's not how many breaths you have taken but how many times it has been taken away!
Has anyone noticed common sense isn't very common anymore.
http://www.perfectpedigrees.com/4genview.php?id=207
It's not how many breaths you have taken but how many times it has been taken away!
Has anyone noticed common sense isn't very common anymore.
Re: BDC question??
Nothing here either.romeo212000 wrote:While I see how such a game could be fun ad entertaining to the average hunter, I fail to see how a game that does not judge quality of work is beneficial for the furthering of hunting dog lines. Is it fun? I'm sure it is. But there is no way I would consider making a dog part of my breeding program based on their accomplishments in such a format that does not truly seek to improve hunting dog lines.
http://www.perfectpedigrees.com/4genview.php?id=144
http://www.perfectpedigrees.com/4genview.php?id=207
It's not how many breaths you have taken but how many times it has been taken away!
Has anyone noticed common sense isn't very common anymore.
http://www.perfectpedigrees.com/4genview.php?id=207
It's not how many breaths you have taken but how many times it has been taken away!
Has anyone noticed common sense isn't very common anymore.
Re: BDC question??
I like to run my dogs in events that are similar to where/how we hunt.
We don't have thousands of acres of open ground -- most of our upland hunting
is on 20 acre to 40 acre parcels................ Sometimes on very small CRP or
weed patches or cattail patches, so I have no need for an 'over the hill' or
'out of sight' big running dog --- nor do I want to buy a horse just to keep up.
Dogs that can and do hunt (or run in events) on those huge plantations amaze and thrill
me, but that's not how we hunt up here, so I would have no use for a dog like that.
As far as BDC... those events are very similar to our hunting situations where i live and
I really wish that NSTRA would allow Pointing Labs in their events because those are also
similar to how we hunt.
BDC does allow dogs to break on flush or shot ---- but frequently this DOES NOT end up
saving time, as the dog frequently loses sight of the fall and puts on a time consuming hunt
to find the bird. Dogs that are steady frequently 'pin the mark' and save time.
Same goes with a delivery to hand. I've often seen a dog come back with a bird, and drop
it 3 feet from the handler and the bird flies away..... Part of the score is "Birds in the bag"
and one that flies away isn''t scored, because it didn't end up in the bag.
All of the doggie games are good, just run in the ones you and your dog enjoy, and when you can,
go spectate at other games even if you don't run a dog.
.
We don't have thousands of acres of open ground -- most of our upland hunting
is on 20 acre to 40 acre parcels................ Sometimes on very small CRP or
weed patches or cattail patches, so I have no need for an 'over the hill' or
'out of sight' big running dog --- nor do I want to buy a horse just to keep up.
Dogs that can and do hunt (or run in events) on those huge plantations amaze and thrill
me, but that's not how we hunt up here, so I would have no use for a dog like that.
As far as BDC... those events are very similar to our hunting situations where i live and
I really wish that NSTRA would allow Pointing Labs in their events because those are also
similar to how we hunt.
BDC does allow dogs to break on flush or shot ---- but frequently this DOES NOT end up
saving time, as the dog frequently loses sight of the fall and puts on a time consuming hunt
to find the bird. Dogs that are steady frequently 'pin the mark' and save time.
Same goes with a delivery to hand. I've often seen a dog come back with a bird, and drop
it 3 feet from the handler and the bird flies away..... Part of the score is "Birds in the bag"
and one that flies away isn''t scored, because it didn't end up in the bag.
All of the doggie games are good, just run in the ones you and your dog enjoy, and when you can,
go spectate at other games even if you don't run a dog.
.
Doc E & HR UH MHR WR SR Black Forest Casey
and
Nami E & HRCH UH HR Sauk River Tucker
and
Nami E & HRCH UH HR Sauk River Tucker
-
- Rank: 5X Champion
- Posts: 1167
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 12:18 pm
Re: BDC question??
And I went on to explain that statement and that it was based in the fact that the reason I said that was the format itself does not do enough to discern the quality from the rubbish. When the dogs are held to such low standards its impossible to determine what is quality and what isn't. Not saying there aren't some dogs with great genetics and capabilities in those formats, but we just cannot know. Therefore, I would not want a pup or breeding from a dog who's accomplishments are in such a format.ezzy333 wrote:anything here about quality of the dogs?romeo212000 wrote:Pretty much the same thing I've seen. I wouldn't want anything to do with one of those dogs.
How many more times do I have to post the exact same thing before some of you comprehend it?
Re: BDC question??
This is exactly the argument made by field trialer when talk NSTRA or hunters talking trialing. To each their own but little to do with the quality of a dog.romeo212000 wrote: I'll try to answer in a clear manner to get all my thoughts on the page.
I play the NSTRA game. I don't believe it is the end all be all bird dog format without flaws. I don't believe that could be said about any format actually. But I do believe that it seeks to further improve hunting dog lines by judging and taking into account several facets of what in my opinion makes a quality bird dog. The quality of the dog's work is scored (Style, intensity, retrieve, ground coverage, obedience, backing, and bird finding ability are all judged and rewarded accordingly).
Please understand I am not saying UFTA or BDC should be done away with, or that people shouldn't play in it if they find it enjoyable. But it is not a legitimate proving ground for the quality of the dogs or furthering and improvement of lines because it does not make an effort to seperate quality dog work from bad or even average. No you can't slight the dogs because their owners don't have them trained to a given level, but you cannot say they are proven either. It's the same way when I'm judging a dog. I can't judge what I cannot see. So even if it is the owner's fault for not training or exposing their dogs to what I would want to see out of the dog, I still can't judge whether it is what I would consider a quality dog and wouldn't be interested in it in any manner.
I hope this answers your questions.
Ezzy
http://www.perfectpedigrees.com/4genview.php?id=144
http://www.perfectpedigrees.com/4genview.php?id=207
It's not how many breaths you have taken but how many times it has been taken away!
Has anyone noticed common sense isn't very common anymore.
http://www.perfectpedigrees.com/4genview.php?id=207
It's not how many breaths you have taken but how many times it has been taken away!
Has anyone noticed common sense isn't very common anymore.
-
- Rank: 5X Champion
- Posts: 1167
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 12:18 pm
Re: BDC question??
What? Can you please clarify that with some complete sentences?ezzy333 wrote:This is exactly the argument made by field trialer when talk NSTRA or hunters talking trialing. To each their own but little to do with the quality of a dog.romeo212000 wrote: I'll try to answer in a clear manner to get all my thoughts on the page.
I play the NSTRA game. I don't believe it is the end all be all bird dog format without flaws. I don't believe that could be said about any format actually. But I do believe that it seeks to further improve hunting dog lines by judging and taking into account several facets of what in my opinion makes a quality bird dog. The quality of the dog's work is scored (Style, intensity, retrieve, ground coverage, obedience, backing, and bird finding ability are all judged and rewarded accordingly).
Please understand I am not saying UFTA or BDC should be done away with, or that people shouldn't play in it if they find it enjoyable. But it is not a legitimate proving ground for the quality of the dogs or furthering and improvement of lines because it does not make an effort to seperate quality dog work from bad or even average. No you can't slight the dogs because their owners don't have them trained to a given level, but you cannot say they are proven either. It's the same way when I'm judging a dog. I can't judge what I cannot see. So even if it is the owner's fault for not training or exposing their dogs to what I would want to see out of the dog, I still can't judge whether it is what I would consider a quality dog and wouldn't be interested in it in any manner.
I hope this answers your questions.
Ezzy
Re: BDC question??
Romeo, Try this. People involved in every venue tend to talk down every other venue. The reason being is the one they are involved in is what they like best and not which is best at determining the best dog. They all pick the winner by which dog does the best in that particular venue. That does not say they pick the dog that is best at all venues.romeo212000 wrote:What? Can you please clarify that with some complete sentences?ezzy333 wrote:This is exactly the argument made by field trialer when talk NSTRA or hunters talking trialing. To each their own but little to do with the quality of a dog.romeo212000 wrote: I'll try to answer in a clear manner to get all my thoughts on the page.
I play the NSTRA game. I don't believe it is the end all be all bird dog format without flaws. I don't believe that could be said about any format actually. But I do believe that it seeks to further improve hunting dog lines by judging and taking into account several facets of what in my opinion makes a quality bird dog. The quality of the dog's work is scored (Style, intensity, retrieve, ground coverage, obedience, backing, and bird finding ability are all judged and rewarded accordingly).
Please understand I am not saying UFTA or BDC should be done away with, or that people shouldn't play in it if they find it enjoyable. But it is not a legitimate proving ground for the quality of the dogs or furthering and improvement of lines because it does not make an effort to seperate quality dog work from bad or even average. No you can't slight the dogs because their owners don't have them trained to a given level, but you cannot say they are proven either. It's the same way when I'm judging a dog. I can't judge what I cannot see. So even if it is the owner's fault for not training or exposing their dogs to what I would want to see out of the dog, I still can't judge whether it is what I would consider a quality dog and wouldn't be interested in it in any manner.
I hope this answers your questions.
Ezzy
I believe you will find exactly what I have and that is that good dogs usually do well with some training at most venues. But we seldom judge a dog like that. You do have a few doing it in GSP's and some in Britts. And the good ones are capable of winning in which ever they are trained in. I am sure there are other people doing it with most other breeds to but you need to look at what the dog has done and not what venue you think is best. The best trained dogs normally win!!!!!
Ezzy
http://www.perfectpedigrees.com/4genview.php?id=144
http://www.perfectpedigrees.com/4genview.php?id=207
It's not how many breaths you have taken but how many times it has been taken away!
Has anyone noticed common sense isn't very common anymore.
http://www.perfectpedigrees.com/4genview.php?id=207
It's not how many breaths you have taken but how many times it has been taken away!
Has anyone noticed common sense isn't very common anymore.
-
- Rank: 5X Champion
- Posts: 1167
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 12:18 pm
Re: BDC question??
I don't necessarily disagree with anything you've said and I've acknowledged that there are almost certainly some good dogs in those venues. However, if you can honestly tell me you believe that a format that makes no attempt to judge quality of work in any way is a good venue for proving quality dogs you're not nearly as knowledgeable as I thought you were.
- nikegundog
- GDF Junkie
- Posts: 1508
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 11:21 am
- Location: SW Minnesota
Re: BDC question??
Your kidding right?romeo212000 wrote:I don't necessarily disagree with anything you've said and I've acknowledged that there are almost certainly some good dogs in those venues. However, if you can honestly tell me you believe that a format that makes no attempt to judge quality of work in any way is a good venue for proving quality dogs you're not nearly as knowledgeable as I thought you were.
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
-
- Rank: 5X Champion
- Posts: 1167
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 12:18 pm
Re: BDC question??
You've already proven this subject matter is over your head. If you're not going to offer anything more than that please feel free not to comment.nikegundog wrote:Your kidding right?romeo212000 wrote:I don't necessarily disagree with anything you've said and I've acknowledged that there are almost certainly some good dogs in those venues. However, if you can honestly tell me you believe that a format that makes no attempt to judge quality of work in any way is a good venue for proving quality dogs you're not nearly as knowledgeable as I thought you were.
And by the way it's "you're". If you're going to call someone else's spelling or grammar out, you should be certain you can spell correctly and use proper grammar.
- nikegundog
- GDF Junkie
- Posts: 1508
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 11:21 am
- Location: SW Minnesota
Re: BDC question??
Romeo oh Romeo, your hostilely is showing again.. In over my head .......regards........romeo212000 wrote:You've already proven this subject matter is over your head. If you're not going to offer anything more than that please feel free not to comment.nikegundog wrote:Your kidding right?romeo212000 wrote:I don't necessarily disagree with anything you've said and I've acknowledged that there are almost certainly some good dogs in those venues. However, if you can honestly tell me you believe that a format that makes no attempt to judge quality of work in any way is a good venue for proving quality dogs you're not nearly as knowledgeable as I thought you were.
And by the way it's "you're". If you're going to call someone else's spelling or grammar out, you should be certain you can spell correctly and use proper grammar.
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
-
- Rank: 5X Champion
- Posts: 1167
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 12:18 pm
Re: BDC question??
Once again, if you can't bring anything better than this to the thread please feel free not to post.nikegundog wrote: Romeo oh Romeo, your hostilely is showing again.. In over my head .......regards........
- nikegundog
- GDF Junkie
- Posts: 1508
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 11:21 am
- Location: SW Minnesota
Re: BDC question??
BDF rules says when you hit 50 posts in one thread you win the argument, your over half way there. :roll:romeo212000 wrote:Once again, if you can't bring anything better than this to the thread please feel free not to post.nikegundog wrote: Romeo oh Romeo, your hostilely is showing again.. In over my head .......regards........
-
- Rank: 5X Champion
- Posts: 1167
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 12:18 pm
Re: BDC question??
You've proven through your posts on this thread that you're incapable of adding anything resembling substantial thought to this thread. Your last post being a shining example. Thanks for playing, but let the grown ups talk now.
- Winchey
- Rank: 5X Champion
- Posts: 925
- Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 8:22 am
- Location: Oromocto New Brunswick, Canada
Re: BDC question??
Romeo, Try this. People involved in every venue tend to talk down every other venue. The reason being is the one they are involved in is what they like best and not which is best at determining the best dog. They all pick the winner by which dog does the best in that particular venue. That does not say they pick the dog that is best at all venues.
I believe you will find exactly what I have and that is that good dogs usually do well with some training at most venues. But we seldom judge a dog like that. You do have a few doing it in GSH's and some in Britts. And the good ones are capable of winning in which ever they are trained in. I am sure there are other people doing it with most other breeds to but you need to look at what the dog has done and not what venue you think is best. The best trained dogs normally win!!!!!
Ezzy[/quote]
So you are saying that Chasehill little Bud is a ch in coverdog, walking, sd hb, aa hb and has a lot of wild birds killed over him because he is the best trained? What about the other dogs that aren't nearly as successful that the same trainer trains and handles, does he just not train them as well? When you get to the top of any of those venues all of the dogs are "well trained" they are seperated by ability and what's between their ears.
Bottom line is, a crappy dog can enjoy more success in BDC than it could in other venues, thus telling people less about the quality of the dog.
I believe you will find exactly what I have and that is that good dogs usually do well with some training at most venues. But we seldom judge a dog like that. You do have a few doing it in GSH's and some in Britts. And the good ones are capable of winning in which ever they are trained in. I am sure there are other people doing it with most other breeds to but you need to look at what the dog has done and not what venue you think is best. The best trained dogs normally win!!!!!
Ezzy[/quote]
So you are saying that Chasehill little Bud is a ch in coverdog, walking, sd hb, aa hb and has a lot of wild birds killed over him because he is the best trained? What about the other dogs that aren't nearly as successful that the same trainer trains and handles, does he just not train them as well? When you get to the top of any of those venues all of the dogs are "well trained" they are seperated by ability and what's between their ears.
Bottom line is, a crappy dog can enjoy more success in BDC than it could in other venues, thus telling people less about the quality of the dog.
-
- Rank: 5X Champion
- Posts: 1167
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 12:18 pm
Re: BDC question??
Not a difficult concept to grasp is it? Amazing how it flys over some people's heads.Winchey wrote:
So you are saying that Chasehill little Bud is a ch in coverdog, walking, sd hb, aa hb and has a lot of wild birds killed over him because he is the best trained? What about the other dogs that aren't nearly as successful that the same trainer trains and handles, does he just not train them as well? When you get to the top of any of those venues all of the dogs are "well trained" they are seperated by ability and what's between their ears.
Bottom line is, a crappy dog can enjoy more success in BDC than it could in other venues, thus telling people less about the quality of the dog.
Re: BDC question??
This thread has me totally bewildered. Just how many forms of hunting/pointing/retrieving trials do you have over there ???
The O.P. trial that began this thread sounds to me like good fun for all involved .....unless they got peppered ! I would do one of those trials as a fun day out but would probably not purchase a pup on the basis that it's sire and dam had won a couple of these trials.
What I would like to know is this ..... does winning a few of these trials get a dogs name and achievement(s) onto the kennel clubs list of champions and does winning these trials entitle you to put those wins onto a pups pedigree ? Could a beginner to the gundog game or someone like me who does not understand the differences between this type of trial and the others , mistakenly believe he/she was purchasing a pup with some serious field trial winning history behind it ?
We only have one kind of hunt-point-retrieve trial over here and this thread interested me because of the number of people here who would like to have something simpler to train for and maybe more easy to win.
Bill T.
The O.P. trial that began this thread sounds to me like good fun for all involved .....unless they got peppered ! I would do one of those trials as a fun day out but would probably not purchase a pup on the basis that it's sire and dam had won a couple of these trials.
What I would like to know is this ..... does winning a few of these trials get a dogs name and achievement(s) onto the kennel clubs list of champions and does winning these trials entitle you to put those wins onto a pups pedigree ? Could a beginner to the gundog game or someone like me who does not understand the differences between this type of trial and the others , mistakenly believe he/she was purchasing a pup with some serious field trial winning history behind it ?
We only have one kind of hunt-point-retrieve trial over here and this thread interested me because of the number of people here who would like to have something simpler to train for and maybe more easy to win.
Bill T.
The older I get, the better I was !
- nikegundog
- GDF Junkie
- Posts: 1508
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 11:21 am
- Location: SW Minnesota
Re: BDC question??
Only an AKC trial or hunt test title will get your title placed on your AKC registration, however there are many different games and people have different opinions on which ones are best.Trekmoor wrote:This thread has me totally bewildered. Just how many forms of hunting/pointing/retrieving trials do you have over there ???
The O.P. trial that began this thread sounds to me like good fun for all involved .....unless they got peppered ! I would do one of those trials as a fun day out but would probably not purchase a pup on the basis that it's sire and dam had won a couple of these trials.
What I would like to know is this ..... does winning a few of these trials get a dogs name and achievement(s) onto the kennel clubs list of champions and does winning these trials entitle you to put those wins onto a pups pedigree ? Could a beginner to the gundog game or someone like me who does not understand the differences between this type of trial and the others , mistakenly believe he/she was purchasing a pup with some serious field trial winning history behind it ?
We only have one kind of hunt-point-retrieve trial over here and this thread interested me because of the number of people here who would like to have something simpler to train for and maybe more easy to win.
Bill T.
- nikegundog
- GDF Junkie
- Posts: 1508
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 11:21 am
- Location: SW Minnesota
Re: BDC question??
Romeo, I thought I would stay out of this but I just can't help myself with your last post, you have been a dog owner for a grand total of FOUR YEARS now, in those four you have now became an internet expert, congratulations very few guys have achieved your status in four years and one dog, carry on Jr.romeo212000 wrote:You've proven through your posts on this thread that you're incapable of adding anything resembling substantial thought to this thread. Your last post being a shining example. Thanks for playing, but let the grown ups talk now.
- Cajun Casey
- GDF Junkie
- Posts: 4243
- Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2010 9:59 pm
- Location: Tulsa, OK
Re: BDC question??
AKC is one of three major US registries. The FDSB and UKC are the other two. HRC and NSTRA run under UKC sanctions and the titles earned appear on the dogs' UKC pedigrees. NSTRA was previously allied with the FDSB and had Championships recorded on those pedigrees. AKC and UKC have formats for upland, pointing, retrieving and spaniel categories. There is also NAVHDA, which is allied with AKC, except for red setters, but has its own registry, titles and pedigrees. It is more similar to the FCI system for gun and retrieving breeds.nikegundog wrote:Only an AKC trial or hunt test title will get your title placed on your AKC registration, however there are many different games and people have different opinions on which ones are best.Trekmoor wrote:This thread has me totally bewildered. Just how many forms of hunting/pointing/retrieving trials do you have over there ???
The O.P. trial that began this thread sounds to me like good fun for all involved .....unless they got peppered ! I would do one of those trials as a fun day out but would probably not purchase a pup on the basis that it's sire and dam had won a couple of these trials.
What I would like to know is this ..... does winning a few of these trials get a dogs name and achievement(s) onto the kennel clubs list of champions and does winning these trials entitle you to put those wins onto a pups pedigree ? Could a beginner to the gundog game or someone like me who does not understand the differences between this type of trial and the others , mistakenly believe he/she was purchasing a pup with some serious field trial winning history behind it ?
We only have one kind of hunt-point-retrieve trial over here and this thread interested me because of the number of people here who would like to have something simpler to train for and maybe more easy to win.
Bill T.
Never try to teach a pig to sing. It wastes your time and annoys the pig.
BDC question??
What about the dogs that have been bred based on hunting ability alone? Is hunting a venue for proving quality dogs?romeo212000 wrote:I don't necessarily disagree with anything you've said and I've acknowledged that there are almost certainly some good dogs in those venues. However, if you can honestly tell me you believe that a format that makes no attempt to judge quality of work in any way is a good venue for proving quality dogs you're not nearly as knowledgeable as I thought you were.
-
- Rank: 5X Champion
- Posts: 1167
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 12:18 pm
Re: BDC question??
I would have to see those dogs in action to make that determination.brad27 wrote:What about the dogs that have been bred based on hunting ability alone? Is hunting a venue for proving quality dogs?romeo212000 wrote:I don't necessarily disagree with anything you've said and I've acknowledged that there are almost certainly some good dogs in those venues. However, if you can honestly tell me you believe that a format that makes no attempt to judge quality of work in any way is a good venue for proving quality dogs you're not nearly as knowledgeable as I thought you were.
-
- Rank: 5X Champion
- Posts: 1167
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 12:18 pm
Re: BDC question??
It's quite obvious I'm far more knowledgeable than you.nikegundog wrote:Romeo, I thought I would stay out of this but I just can't help myself with your last post, you have been a dog owner for a grand total of FOUR YEARS now, in those four you have now became an internet expert, congratulations very few guys have achieved your status in four years and one dog, carry on Jr.romeo212000 wrote:You've proven through your posts on this thread that you're incapable of adding anything resembling substantial thought to this thread. Your last post being a shining example. Thanks for playing, but let the grown ups talk now.
- nikegundog
- GDF Junkie
- Posts: 1508
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 11:21 am
- Location: SW Minnesota
Re: BDC question??
Yes, that is quite obvious to everyone, from the time someone gets there first dog and sends it out to have trained its then about 1 year till they no more than everyone else.romeo212000 wrote:It's quite obvious I'm far more knowledgeable than you.nikegundog wrote:Romeo, I thought I would stay out of this but I just can't help myself with your last post, you have been a dog owner for a grand total of FOUR YEARS now, in those four you have now became an internet expert, congratulations very few guys have achieved your status in four years and one dog, carry on Jr.romeo212000 wrote:You've proven through your posts on this thread that you're incapable of adding anything resembling substantial thought to this thread. Your last post being a shining example. Thanks for playing, but let the grown ups talk now.
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
-
- Rank: 5X Champion
- Posts: 1167
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 12:18 pm
Re: BDC question??
Again. Deflection and nothing of substance. You never say anything to defend your knowledge. You just make wise a$$ remarks to me. Enjoy your holiday sir.nikegundog wrote: Yes, that is quite obvious to everyone, from the time someone gets there first dog and sends it out to have trained its then about 1 year till they no more than everyone else.
Re: BDC question??
So basically your saying a dog would have to meet your standards, which happen to fall most in line with NSTRA for a hunting dog to be worthy?romeo212000 wrote:I would have to see those dogs in action to make that determination.brad27 wrote:What about the dogs that have been bred based on hunting ability alone? Is hunting a venue for proving quality dogs?romeo212000 wrote:I don't necessarily disagree with anything you've said and I've acknowledged that there are almost certainly some good dogs in those venues. However, if you can honestly tell me you believe that a format that makes no attempt to judge quality of work in any way is a good venue for proving quality dogs you're not nearly as knowledgeable as I thought you were.
And a guy who has owned a hunting preserve trained and bred dogs for thirty years was a NSTRA judge but quit because he is tired of dealing with guys similar to you has no place breeding dogs. I feel bad for all those customers who waited in line for his pups before you could give your approval.
“Heaven goes by favor. If it went by merit, you would stay out and your dog would go in.”
- Mark Twain-
- Mark Twain-
-
- Rank: 5X Champion
- Posts: 1167
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 12:18 pm
Re: BDC question??
Please quote where I said that. My comments were I reference to bdc type venues and their failure to differentiate quality work from shoddy work.Garrison wrote:romeo212000 wrote:So basically your saying a dog would have to meet your standards, which happen to fall most in line with NSTRA for a hunting dog to be worthy?brad27 wrote: I would have to see those dogs in action to make that determination.
And a guy who has owned a hunting preserve trained and bred dogs for thirty years was a NSTRA judge but quit because he is tired of dealing with guys similar to you has no place breeding dogs. I feel bad for all those customers who waited in line for his pups before you could give your approval.
Also, I didn't say I was only interested in nstra dogs.... Ever. I said bdc and venues like it do not even attempt to judge quality work and therefore does not tell me enough to interest me based in accomplishments in those venues alone.
There seems to be a real problem with people taking things out of context on this forum. Try again though bud. That attempt was weak.
Re: BDC question??
I did, you would have to see those dogs to make that determination. I didn't know you personally were a legitimate venue. What makes your assessment any more credible than any one else?
I would have to see those dogs in action to make that determination.[/quote]
I would have to see those dogs in action to make that determination.[/quote]
“Heaven goes by favor. If it went by merit, you would stay out and your dog would go in.”
- Mark Twain-
- Mark Twain-
-
- Rank: 5X Champion
- Posts: 1167
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 12:18 pm
Re: BDC question??
[/quote]Garrison wrote:I did, you would have to see those dogs to make that determination. I didn't know you personally were a legitimate venue. What makes your assessment any more credible than any one else?
I would have to see those dogs in action to make that determination.
I was speaking for myself personally. I would hope that anyone would want to see dogs that are purely hunting dogs before getting a pup from them. It's called due diligence. It doesn't make me a snob. It's called doing your homework.
Once again, completely out of context. Carry on being defensive based on something that wasn't actually said though.
Re: BDC question??
brad27 wrote:What about the dogs that have been bred based on hunting ability alone? Is hunting a venue for proving quality dogs?
romeo212000 wrote: I would have to see those dogs in action to make that determination. I was speaking for myself personally. I would hope that anyone would want to see dogs that are purely hunting dogs before getting a pup from them. It's called due diligence
So the titled dog not be checked out and the pure hunting dog should
Be careful you just might run into some hunting machines that will wax that highly titled dog on daily basis when run on wild birds.
-
- Rank: 5X Champion
- Posts: 1167
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 12:18 pm
Re: BDC question??
Again, never said that. Quit putting words in my mouth people. But a title that I know tests the quality of the dog at least gives me something to go on.Ms. Cage wrote:brad27 wrote:What about the dogs that have been bred based on hunting ability alone? Is hunting a venue for proving quality dogs?
romeo212000 wrote: I would have to see those dogs in action to make that determination. I was speaking for myself personally. I would hope that anyone would want to see dogs that are purely hunting dogs before getting a pup from them. It's called due diligence
So the titled dog not be checked out and the pure hunting dog should
Be careful you just might run into some hunting machines that will wax that highly titled dog on daily basis when run on wild birds.
Re: BDC question??
Depends on the qualities your looking for. Some like big run, some don't. Some want strong water work , some don't, etc. I think that's why we have all the games. Folks like what they like. Maybe it's best to repect everybodys venue and leave it at that...romeo212000 wrote:But a title that I know tests the quality of the dog at least gives me something to go on.
-
- Rank: 5X Champion
- Posts: 1167
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 12:18 pm
Re: BDC question??
Right, but the point is these other venues at least judge these other desirable qualities whereas bdc type formats do not. That's all I'm saying.Ms. Cage wrote:Depends on the qualities your looking for. Some like big run, some don't. Some want strong water work , some don't, etc. I think that's why we have all the games. Folks like what they like. Maybe it's best to repect everybodys venue and leave it at that...romeo212000 wrote:But a title that I know tests the quality of the dog at least gives me something to go on.
Calling a spade a spade doesn't make me close minded. It means I'm willing to call things what they are rather than worrying about stroking everybody's egos.
- ACooper
- GDF Premier Member!
- Posts: 3397
- Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 1:37 pm
- Location: Sometimes I'm in Oklahoma
Re: BDC question??
You realize that everything you are saying about BDC (and bdc type events) many people say the same things about NSTRA correct?romeo212000 wrote:Right, but the point is these other venues at least judge these other desirable qualities whereas bdc type formats do not. That's all I'm saying.Ms. Cage wrote:Depends on the qualities your looking for. Some like big run, some don't. Some want strong water work , some don't, etc. I think that's why we have all the games. Folks like what they like. Maybe it's best to repect everybodys venue and leave it at that...romeo212000 wrote:But a title that I know tests the quality of the dog at least gives me something to go on.
Calling a spade a spade doesn't make me close minded. It means I'm willing to call things what they are rather than worrying about stroking everybody's egos.
-
- Rank: 5X Champion
- Posts: 1167
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 12:18 pm
Re: BDC question??
Again. Nstra judges and makes an attempt to differentiate quality work from shoddy work. Bdc does not. That fact cannot be refuted or disproven. Come on people. This isn't a difficult concept to grasp.ACooper wrote:
You realize that everything you are saying about BDC (and bdc type events) many people say the same things about NSTRA correct?
Re: BDC question??
That's like me saying i don't like your game ( NSTRA ) because the dog breaks on shot or the dog is collared once the back is established vs. having to stand throgh the retrieve.romeo212000 wrote:Calling a spade a spade doesn't make me close minded. It means I'm willing to call things what they are rather than worrying about stroking everybody's egos.
To me my statement is narrow minded... When your pointing fingers at another venue, look at the 3 pointing back at you.
-
- Rank: 5X Champion
- Posts: 1167
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 12:18 pm
Re: BDC question??
If you don't feel like dogs thy are successful from the nstra venue give you enough information to go one because they don't show you what you want then that's certainly within reason in my opinion. However, this conversation has never been about standards of steadiness per say. It has always been about the fact that bdc and like events makes absolutely zero attempt to differentiate quality work from shoddy work. That's the whole premise for my posts in this thread.Ms. Cage wrote:That's like me saying i don't like your game ( NSTRA ) because the dog breaks on shot or the dog is collared once the back is established vs. having to stand throgh the retrieve.romeo212000 wrote:Calling a spade a spade doesn't make me close minded. It means I'm willing to call things what they are rather than worrying about stroking everybody's egos.
To me my statement is narrow minded... When your pointing fingers at another venue, look at the 3 pointing back at you.
But once agin people make statements without knowing what I'm actually saying and take my words out of context..., sigh.
- ACooper
- GDF Premier Member!
- Posts: 3397
- Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 1:37 pm
- Location: Sometimes I'm in Oklahoma
Re: BDC question??
No one is having a hard time grasping anything except you apparently, my comment only stated that your venue of choice is held by many in the same regard as you hold BDC type events. I made no comment on how NSTRA is judged or dog quality. You're missing the forest for the trees.romeo212000 wrote:Again. Nstra judges and makes an attempt to differentiate quality work from shoddy work. Bdc does not. That fact cannot be refuted or disproven. Come on people. This isn't a difficult concept to grasp.ACooper wrote:
You realize that everything you are saying about BDC (and bdc type events) many people say the same things about NSTRA correct?
-
- Rank: 5X Champion
- Posts: 1167
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 12:18 pm
Re: BDC question??
No they don't because my argument Is bdc doesn't make an attempt to judge quality work whereas nstra does. Nobody is making that argument about nstra and if you do, we'll you're pretty dang ignorant on the matter. Looks like you're the one missing the forest for the trees.ACooper wrote:No one is having a hard time grasping anything except you apparently, my comment only stated that your venue of choice is held by many in the same regard as you hold BDC type events. I made no comment on how NSTRA is judged or dog quality. You're missing the forest for the trees.romeo212000 wrote:Again. Nstra judges and makes an attempt to differentiate quality work from shoddy work. Bdc does not. That fact cannot be refuted or disproven. Come on people. This isn't a difficult concept to grasp.ACooper wrote:
You realize that everything you are saying about BDC (and bdc type events) many people say the same things about NSTRA correct?
Re: BDC question??
Still failing to see how this could possibly be taken out of context.romeo212000 wrote:I would have to see those dogs in action to make that determination.brad27 wrote:What about the dogs that have been bred based on hunting ability alone? Is hunting a venue for proving quality dogs?romeo212000 wrote:I don't necessarily disagree with anything you've said and I've acknowledged that there are almost certainly some good dogs in those venues. However, if you can honestly tell me you believe that a format that makes no attempt to judge quality of work in any way is a good venue for proving quality dogs you're not nearly as knowledgeable as I thought you were.
“Heaven goes by favor. If it went by merit, you would stay out and your dog would go in.”
- Mark Twain-
- Mark Twain-
Re: BDC question??
There you go!!! 3 fingers pointing back at you again!!!!romeo212000 wrote:Nobody is making that argument about nstra and if you do, we'll you're pretty dang ignorant on the matter.
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)